case: ([ Etna; Hee. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-10-01 04:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #269 ]


⌈ Secret Post #269 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.



Notes:

1. The F!S Friending Meme! Go do it! I am totally open to friending. (:
2. Have some emopuppy in a fish tank!
3. BECAUSE I CAN: TAKE THIS POLL BUTTMUNCHERS FTW

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 168 secrets from Secret Submission Post #039.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 21 OP.)

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, doesn't a loss of respect sort of follow automatically? Because it's not (at least I don't think it is) a WILLFUL ignorance, it's a failure to understand the canon in the first place.

Re: 21 OP.)

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-10-01 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends. Maybe it's not that big a deal to most people even if it pisses them off. *shrugs*

Re: 21 OP.)

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying it's a big deal, I'm not claiming for an instant that if someone ships Edgeworth/Franziska I automatically think of them as the scum of the earth; and I admit to being puzzled over the backlash to my phrasing the secret as such (I'm considerably on the newer side to this community).

Re: 21 OP.)

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-10-01 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
For what it's worth, sorry I got snarky with you. Phrasing's key; say something in a way that sounds bratty/elitist/confrontational/etc, people'll take it the wrong way. Of course, you also shouldn't have to proofread everything you wanna say that's on your mind...it's complicated.

Re: 21 OP.)

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
No worries, and I guess I... sort of understand?

I dunno. As an author and someone who loves the characters and the multifaceted bonds between them, I take extra care when planning to make sure that what I want to do fits into canon; and if there's a conflict? Well, I try to adjust my story to it rather than adjusting the canon to my story. These two characters in particular have one of my favorite relationships in fandom, a wonderful sibling dynamic. And if I see someone writing them in a way that blatantly conflicts or contradicts what's been explicitly established, it sort of irks me and rubs me the wrong way as both a reader and a writer.

So yeah. I kind of understand the backlash, but... bleh, I don't know where I was going for this. Anyway, don't worry about initial snippiness.

Re: 21 OP.)

[identity profile] sarajayechan.livejournal.com 2007-10-01 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I know what you mean. I'm not above taking liberties with canon here and there, my views of characters may be a little different from canon/widely accepted fanon, but I like to respect canon cause without it I wouldn't have my favorite characters to write about.