case: ([ Etna; Hee. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-10-01 04:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #269 ]


⌈ Secret Post #269 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.



Notes:

1. The F!S Friending Meme! Go do it! I am totally open to friending. (:
2. Have some emopuppy in a fish tank!
3. BECAUSE I CAN: TAKE THIS POLL BUTTMUNCHERS FTW

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 168 secrets from Secret Submission Post #039.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
which is what I was trying to say here in the secret.

and failed miserably too.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't feel it was that much of a failure; there are spots I could have phrased it better, but to me it still gets the point across.

Hm. Perhaps, therein, lies the problem. It gets the point across "to me" when I already know what I'm talking about >_>

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-02 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, that's condescending. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean that they don't "get" what you're talking about.

Re: 21

[identity profile] kinneas.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
It seems to have made sense to most people.

"If you want to ship it as an incestuous pairing, that's fine," is pretty glaringly obvious.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-02 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
actually it didn't since a lot of people seemed to have issues with how she phrased it.

Re: 21

[identity profile] kinneas.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Issues with the losing respect bit, not the sweeping generalization (of which there is none) regarding all MxF shippers.