[ SECRET POST #269 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #269 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.



Notes:

1. The F!S Friending Meme! Go do it! I am totally open to friending. (:
2. Have some emopuppy in a fish tank!
3. BECAUSE I CAN: TAKE THIS POLL BUTTMUNCHERS FTW

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 168 secrets from Secret Submission Post #039.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: 21 OP here...

[moebot.livejournal.com]

Awwww, you're sick? Go back to bed, snookums :3

Re: 21 OP here...

[(Anonymous)]

I'm still not entirely clear on exactly what I did to you to make you so interested in trolling me, but... meh.

Re: 21 OP here...

[moebot.livejournal.com]

This isn't trolling, actually. This is just me openly calling you a patronizing fanbrat without bothering to sugarcoat it or play your little game of pretension.

Here's a hint: no one actually cares about your secret beyond "iawtc" or "idawtc." The only reason you're getting backlash is because a)you phrased it in a way that is guaranteed that no one here will take you seriously, b)you insisted on arguing with anyone who dares disagree with your oh-so-extensive "canon" knowledge, and c) then made a comment calling attention to the fact that you obviously think you are on a higher plane of fandom than everyone else.

In short, you're the reason people are being jerks to you.

Re: 21 OP here...

[(Anonymous)]

I'm blunt, I'm fully aware of this. I made this post because, as people pointed out, the way I phrased the secret I originally submitted didn't get my point across at all. And I apologize for using that phrasing, but how the hell was I supposed to know about it? It's not in the rules and I'm not exactly an old-timer in this comm. I understand that now, though, and won't use that phrase in any other secrets I submit.

And I hardly see what's wrong with arguing with something I strongly disagree with.

As to the third comment? Uh... that's... very, very incorrect. I certainly don't think that by any stretch of the matter.

Re: 21 OP here...

[moebot.livejournal.com]

It's okay, son, you'll get it one day! :)

Re: 21 OP here...

[(Anonymous)]

I'm guilty of phrasing something wrong (that I didn't KNOW was unaccepted here in the comm, and I've acknowledged that) and being a bit blunt and abrasive in my arguing style.

Everything else you've said is wrong, and just as patronizing and elitist as you're accusing me of being.

Re: 21 OP here...

[moebot.livejournal.com]

"Everything else you've said is wrong, and just as patronizing and elitist as you're accusing me of being."

So do you get it now?

Re: 21 OP here...

[(Anonymous)]

Get what? That you're accusing me of being something I'm not and doing so in a patronizing and elitist manner that ironically makes you seem more like what you're accusing me of?


...my sincerest apologies if that last sentence made no sense, I believe my flu medicine just kicked in X_x

Re: 21 OP here...

[moebot.livejournal.com]

So you don't get it.