[ SECRET POST #2394 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2394 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[comma_chameleon]

I think GO (and honestly Gaiman and Pratchett in general) are authors that most people either tend to like or dislike something they've written.

... that sounds confusing to me even reading that. Okay, what I mean is, in my personal experience, I don't like everything both of them have done, their works seem to be hit and miss for me. So someone who loves Good Omens might not like Going Postal or Stardust, and someone who loves American Gods etc, might not like Good Omens.

If that makes more sense? :/ I'm not braining very well today.

[queerwolf]

Makes sense :)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

It makes sense to me. I love Good Omens, but their stand alone work? Not so much.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this makes sense.

I don't like many of Gaiman's novels (except for Anansi Boys), but I love his kid's books and The Sandman.

Good Omens was... good, but not the work of genius people had hyped it up to be.