[ SECRET POST #2394 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2394 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thene]

Yeah but private healthcare is actually worse, in terms of both absolute outcomes and efficiency; in the USA the over-60s (ie. Medicare recipients) are the only group that rate their health coverage as more 'satisfactory' than not, and the private healthcare system is thought to be a major reason why even well-off Americans live shorter lives than similarly well-off people in other developed countries. For these privileges, the US spends 2.5x as much of its GDP on healthcare as the OECD average, while most other OECD health systems deliver better outcomes and longer lifespans. tl;dr private healthcare is the objectively worst, even for the people who can afford to use it.

[(Anonymous)]

That sort of depends - if you're rich *enough* the private healthcare in the states is pretty much the best thing ever. It's just that the "rich enough" bar is *so* high that most people get screwed over.