[ SECRET POST #2405 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2405 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 099 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I wouldn't call myself a Marxist personally, but there's certainly an argument to be made there.

However, I would argue that there is a difference between unjust systems of power and wealth and resources generally, and the existence of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy generally, in the sense that the latter posits the existence of a fundamental legal and personal distinction between different classes of human beings. It posits a fundamental legal inequality, as opposed to the real inequality which inequality of wealth and bigotry and all those things represent. I don't think any of them are good. But there is something distinct about the existence of a monarchy, or anything of that nature, and I think it is wrong on principle.