[ SECRET POST #2405 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2405 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 099 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's an often repeated argument, but it doesn't really make sense. Do you honestly think people would stop visiting royal/historic sites if there was no royal family? Plenty of tourists still visit Versailles even though the French monarchy is gone.

[(Anonymous)]

My understanding is the royal family owns many of those houses and historic sites as private property. They loan them to the government and keep them open to the public now, but if they ere no longer royal they'd have no real incentive to keep doing so. So the argument does make sense in that way.