Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-03 03:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2405 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2405 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 099 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 09:55 am (UTC)(link)That doesn't mean that inheritance is automatically bad - after all, the parents have a right to do with their money as they will, since they did earn it. The morals of inheritance are, as a matter of fact, a really fucking complicated topic.
But if you're not going to complain about all of it, complaining specifically about the royals makes you look like you A) don't actually know what's up there (they're a financial net positive for the UK before even looking at tourism), and B) like you're railing against a visible institution because you can't be bothered to understand the underlying issues in the system.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-04 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)Even in the case of inheritance, although it is tricky, we do try to make regulations and taxes to control the effect that inheritance has on society and that massive economic inequities have on society, and we try to ensure that these things are limited. But the case is different here - for one thing, you can't possibly say that the royal family has their position because they've earned it. But more importantly, their inheritance is something other than money, it is a fundamental legal and political distinction.
I fully accept that there's thorny issues surrounding inheritance and surrounding power and social inequity, and that none of those issues would go away if a country got rid of its monarchy. However, being opposed to the monarchy doesn't mean that we can't address those issues at the same time. We can have many political beliefs, and advocate doing many things, simultaneously, especially when those beliefs don't contradict each other in any way and even reinforce each other.
A hereditary monarchy is in itself unjust and wrong, and therefore it should be ended. Full stop. Regardless of whether there are other problems in society (of course there are), or whether it's an economic benefit to the country, whatever the context surrounding it, it is unjust, illegitimate, and insupportable, and should be ended because of that.