[ SECRET POST #2406 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2406 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

I will never be sorry for being on the side of survivors and the wrongly accused.

False accusations undermine the credibility of claims made by real survivors and also have a negative impact on public funds granted to survivor centers. What she did wasn't just morally wrong in the sense that she wanted to hurt his career or get attention for herself, it was wrong because she's hurting real survivors. You're on her side? Then you are NOT on the side of survivors.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

+1

False accusations hurt real victims.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

so tell me how to differentiate between the two? you literally can't.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

It's best to believe someone and treat them accordingly. Unless of course they claim severe, lasting injuries that aren't present, were never treated, and left no trace. Someone who does that is clearly lying.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

As a person observing online, I would have the same amount of "proof" regardless. I'd rather believe a thousand fakes than disbelieve one true one. The arguments against the allegations being true sound too much like the ones my rapist' s supporters used to try to discredit me. Asking someone who says they have been raped for 'receipts' is so wrong to me.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

"Innocent until proven guilty." That requires providing evidence to establish proof. And in Fassbender's case, there was no evidence against him. There was a great deal of evidence that she made it up, the same stuff people have been listing here over and over.

I'm sorry you were raped but that does not make him an abuser.

Re: op

[(Anonymous)]

She didn't say she was raped. She said he broke her nose and ruptured an ovary and dislocated her knee. Those are all things that require medical attention, which she never got. No one has to ask her for proof, her body would bear it whether she wanted to or not.