case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-04 03:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #2406 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2406 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2013-08-05 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
Look, there's a vast difference between making a completely rational assumption or guess based on available evidence, personal experience and statistical probability, until corrected, and trying to dictate that someone must conform to one's assumption.

The other anon is correct, your case is highly unusual, and anon's assumption will likely hold true for the vast majority of people anon meets in their lifetime. Generalizations that are firmly grounded in fact are not evil, as long as they are not held to be absolutes and used to try to force people to conform or to discriminate against them if they don't.