[ SECRET POST #2407 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2407 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

People like to, uh, banal-ify him for some reason. IDGI. He's like an agent of chaos, and that's what makes him such a fun, intriguing character. The only regularity to his murders in canon is that prior to meeting Will Graham, he tended to murder in groups of three. But everything we've seen him do is spontaneous, not fixed by any motive or victim type or MO or ritual. He kills on the spur of the moment, when the opportunity arises. The people we've seen him kill for his meals (rude guy who drew his blood, for example), he seems to kill on whim depending on what he feels like eating for dinner. He doesn't follow rules, he does what he feels like.

[(Anonymous)]

Yep. And it seems very clear to me that he is fixated more on the eating and perhaps the mental fuckery than on an easily fixed type of victim, which is what makes him a difficult serial killer to pin down. (That is, compared to GJH and his pattern of "young brunettes", Hannibal's "rude and/or in the way" is very subjective/specific to Hannibal, and not the kind of indicators that are easily picked up by an investigator.)

[(Anonymous)]

ILU, anon!

this is my favourite interpretation of the character. i like the idea that he deliberately obscures any pattern or MO in order to mess with people.