[ SECRET POST #2407 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2407 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

"It hasn't happened so far and therefore it never can and never will"

that's all I hear you saying

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Because there's nothing in canon to suggest that he *would*. It's the same reason why I don't see Harry Potter becoming a serial rapist.

Re: OP

[ibroketuesday]

Except that's an exaggerated, outlandish comparison. Harry never exhibited any behavior or personality traits that would lead to his becoming a rapist -- for example, he's never displayed sadism, misogyny, feelings of entitlement toward women, sexual aggression, etc. Hannibal Lecter, on the other hand, is a serial killer, and you're nitpicking about what types of people he might arbitrarily decide to never, ever murder? In the books, was he ever shown killing librarians? If not, are we to assume they're sacrosanct as well?

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Hannibal Lecter, on the other hand, is a serial killer, and you're nitpicking about what types of people he might arbitrarily decide to never, ever murder?

Given that he didn't kill indiscriminately? That he was offended when someone hurt children (Verger)? Yes.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

There's a difference between children and teenagers though. It's well within reason for him to think killing five year olds is a bad thing while also believing teenagers are old enough to be killed if he has a reason to.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

If that was true, then Harris would have had him kill some.