case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-14 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2416 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2416 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________




02.


__________________________________________________




03.


__________________________________________________




04.


__________________________________________________




05.


__________________________________________________




06.


__________________________________________________




07.


__________________________________________________




08.


__________________________________________________




09.


__________________________________________________




10.


__________________________________________________




11.


__________________________________________________




12.


__________________________________________________




13.


__________________________________________________




14.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
na

I recall reading about a Disney executive explicitly stating that they started using those titles because Princess an the Frog didn't do as well as they thought, so they concluded it must have been because the title had "princess" in it and that little boys wouldn't want to go see a movie that referred to a female.

People really raged about it a few years ago.