Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-15 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2417 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2417 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)That said, I wish more people would have brought up the cannibalism (and by extension, vomit) before I went to see the movie. None of the people I've seen talking about it mentioned it at all, and when I saw that particular scene I seriously got physically ill.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
From the stills and the plot synopsis I thought this sounded like a parody. (The Lone Ranger is a lawyer? Who literally comes back from the dead?) (Cannibalism?) (A freakin' bird on his head?)
Maybe they should have gone that way. It might have been a better movie.
no subject
I avoided basically everything to do with this movie, so I was operating under the delusion that it was just a straight remake.
What...but...why?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 01:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 02:31 am (UTC)(link)there are no other good reasons
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 03:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 07:02 am (UTC)(link)Then I saw the movie...and was sadly mistaken. :(
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 07:18 am (UTC)(link)You know what's sad, is that this would a) have been a great way to update the premise, and b) have been a great excuse for having Johnny Depp basically play Captain Jack Sparrow in an unrelated movie, which he did anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-16 10:52 am (UTC)(link)Thank god I didn't go and watch that movie.
(Didn't really plan to aynway because I love crows and having a stuffed crow on Depp's stupid head for the whole movie was just "... nah, fuck it.")
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-18 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)http://gillatt.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/white_guardian_and_black_guardian.jpg