Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-19 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2421 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2421 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #346.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
Not OP
(Anonymous) 2013-08-20 12:03 am (UTC)(link)Not OP either
(Anonymous) 2013-08-20 12:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not OP
(Anonymous) 2013-08-20 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-19 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
After all, they're not being paid or tricked into following, are they?
no subject
no subject
Oh my God. You are NOT the authority on Pond! Do you have any idea how pretentious you are?? This is why I hate the Big Name Fan worship, a Big Name Fan gets an idea and suddenly the sheep start accepting it as canon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-20 12:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)Some people just make you gape and shake your head in astonishment at how sincerely, bullheadedly they believe that their interpretations and speculations and headcanons are the gospel truth and anyone who has a different opinion cannot possibly be rejecting that person's interpretation -- no, no, they must simply be "missing" something or have "different values". The possibility that other people actually disagree with their precious ~meta analysis~ is just unfathomable.
People with that attitude send me into a flail of irritation, even when a lot of their ideas are pretty damn great (*cough* tenlittlebullets *cough*) -- it's the fact that people like that just can't wrap their minds around the concept that their great ideas are just ideas and not factual canon that makes them unbearable.
Isn't this how it goes with every fandom?
I mean, granted, I've rarely seen BNFs trying to sell themselves as some kind of authority on a character or fanon, but the sheeple effect tends to be in place, either way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-21 03:36 am (UTC)(link)Even if they want to come out and say they disagree, they do it on their own blogs and tag it as something that they know is on the BNF's blacklist, because god forbid they ever disagreed with her publicly.