case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-22 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2424 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2423 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #346.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-23 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
It probably has to do with the line drawn between written and visual, and the line between children and teenagers. There's little to no prosecution of written fictional child porn that I've ever heard of here in the States, but anime/manga actually has pictures of fictional children, and in a lot of places in the West, that's the "fuck no" threshold, both morally and legally speaking. Even a lot of anime/manga/fanart/comic porn sites are wary of hosting work that features characters stated to be younger than a certain age (anywhere from fourteen to eighteen, depending) in sexual situations for fear of prosecution. There's a huge debate about it, dunno where you've been.

So, it's less that "lol it's only okay so long as it's Western" and more "lol we try to draw the line at CP art".