Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-24 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #2426 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2426 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-24 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)The thing is a movie can be successful without being the next Twilight / Harry Potter / Hunger Games; movie execs just need to set their expectations, their budgets, and their whole mindset appropriately. There's nothing wrong with making a movie that's aimed pretty much solely at the teen marketplace, especially if you can execute well on it and make it pretty cheaply. The problem comes when you don't make your budget with that in mind and when you have a wildly insane understanding of how big something is going to be. It's bad business sense more than anything.
(Although that having been said, I think it's also worth pointing out that, at this point, anyone who is being realistic about a project with that kind of scale / appeal / demographic logic would probably be way, way more focused on making it a TV show; it probably wouldn't ever come close to being a movie if they were being realistic about it)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-24 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)And also they're really a LOT cheaper. Not sure if I mentioned that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-24 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-24 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)