case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-25 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #2427 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2427 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-25 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Fucking idiot.

Is it really so important to you that every woman looks like a prepubescent girl?

You are a fucking idiot.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-25 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait what? What does that have to do with chard's comment?

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-26 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
He's arguing that the shaved crotches in the medias a good thing and should be kept, and that it would actually be unfeminist to have actresses with pubic hair. Fucking moron doing backwards doublethink to keep his gross shaved crotches on TV.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-26 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
...wow.

First of all, chardmonster is a woman. Where have you been?

Second of all, that's not what she's arguing. She's arguing that forcing a woman to alter her appearance, one way or the other, is problematic. It's wrong to make all women shave their crotches, but it's also wrong to make all women keep their crotches unshaven. A woman should be able to shave or not shave her pussy and no one should tell her otherwise.

You're either an idiot or you're trying way too fucking hard.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-26 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Ok. Fair enough. I apologise.
chardmonster: (Default)

Haha, oh wow

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-08-26 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
How's that C in English treating you? Bet your teacher was a jerk and just didn't like your politics, right?
Edited 2013-08-26 00:45 (UTC)