case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-25 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #2427 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2427 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

(Anonymous) 2013-08-26 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
No one is talking about being liberated or not, so what "being liberated" means is pretty much irrelevant to the conversation.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[personal profile] anonlulz 2013-08-26 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly.

People are talking about women who are actresses, willingly signed a contract to do certain scenes, and who could have agreed (as part of that contract) to grow or not pubic hair for the shots.

And that it would have helped for the realism of the show, because some people find it jarring that poor women and hookers in a medieval setting are completely hairless down there.