fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2432 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2432 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

[Leverage]

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

[Dragon Ball Z]

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

[John Cusack, Say Anything]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Arrested Development]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Star Wars]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Easy A]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Star Trek]

__________________________________________________

10. http://i.imgur.com/XrNzg6P.jpg
[link for porny art, illustrated]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

11. [SPOILERS for Twin Peaks]

__________________________________________________

12. [SPOILERS for dangan ronpa, fire emblem awakening, pokemon special, and gatchaman crowds]

__________________________________________________

13. [SPOILERS for Shingeki no Kyojin/Attack on Titan]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

14. [WARNING for abuse/incest/non-con]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Can a human woman/sexless robot couple be considered f/f if the robot is kind of feminine-looking and often referred to with female pronouns?

I would think so?

I think it's probably one of things where it's going to depend on who you're talking to.

If the robot is using feminine pronouns then it is she and not an it anymore, so yes it would be f/f.

well they did say other people referred to the robot as female which doesn't necessarily mean the robot views itself/herself as female (maybe they just don't care about the concept of gender being that they're, well, a robot who may have a different thought process than humans). I guess it depends on how human this robot is supposed to be. a lot of robots/androids on certain television shows think and feel very similar to humans while others don't at all. Still, f/f would probably be the best label, maybe with a note about the whole robot thing

I would think so.

Will there be a link?

I think you can get away with calling it f/f, but I'd personally specify it as human/robot (if it's not a huge spoiler or anything) just to give people a heads up if they take issue with that sort of thing.

I guess I don't see why not. I know you said it was sexless (so I'm guessing it isn't...anatomically correct) but does the robot consider itself female? And for context, are you talking about a pairing from a specific fandom?

Great, now I want to read/see this.

Count me in as another "I want to see this", OP.

[ SECRET POST #2432 ]

question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question

Re: question