case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-31 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2433 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-08-31 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I sometimes suspect that half of why Shakespeare is so famous is due to a misapprehension. When looking at his minor characters, it becomes apparent that he didn't always care whether they maintained consistent characterization, instead having them do whatever was necessary to move the plot along. This makes me wonder if his "complex" and "multifaceted" main characters are themselves inconsistent, and if the reason it's so hard for actors to portray their many qualities is because those qualities changed with the needs of the story.

(The other half, of course, is that he coined some REALLY good lines, and I'm not about to argue that point. I myself often mimic his style--appropriately modernized, of course--when trying to write something flowery.)