case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-31 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2433 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-31 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I read that, or a similar article. It was something about how by making himself obviously interested in pleasing and being endearing to the female lead, he's actually endearing himself to the audience, and the lack of real chemistry makes it easy for the viewer to imagine themselves taking the female lead's place (since they 'have the connection'.) The thing I read contrasted Cruise to Hugh Jackman, who gets pretty decent chemistry with his female leads, and so his romantic movies fall a little flat for the audience, despite him being more of a 'dreamboat' than Tom.