case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-01 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #2434 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2434 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[A7X]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Stargate Atlantis]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Merlin]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Audrey Cooper, Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Fire Emblem: Awakening]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Avril Lavigne, Tank Girl]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Meet the Robinsons]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Blood+]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Monty Python's Flying Circus]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Valentine Morgenstern, The Mortal Instruments]


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-01 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, it's possible to be promiscuous as hell without being hot.

But seriously. If only beautiful people had sex, or were attractive to others, the world population would look much different. Looking good (which is a fickle quality anyway) is only a fraction of what goes into good sex anyway -- there's the skill involved in actually doing it, for one.

Fuck away and fuck the haters? Good, healthy, safe casual sex is not that hard to find.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-01 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
There's this stereotype that beautiful men and women are the worst at sex because they are not trying to please their partners, knowing if they lose them they can easily get a replacement anyways.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
Possible yeah, but for some of us it's a little more challenging unless you throw all your standards out the window. Maybe OP doesn't want to do that.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm. I'm the kind of person who can't get off to sex unless I'm looking good. It's all about narcissism for me. I hate it because I'm pretty insecure so its rare for me to 100% throw care to the wind and enjoy casual sex. I wish I could not care as much. Sometimes I don't and it's amazing, but most of the time I do...

(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with you and in fact I've worked in a clinic providing contraception/pregnancy testing etc, and there is literally no correlation between the most sexually active people with the highest number of partners and physical appearance. Sometimes the most stunning person will come in and they will be the one who talks about hardly ever having sex, or just meeting someone after years without, or whatever. The opposite is also true.

This is of course even taking out the whole how we define beauty question!