[ SECRET POST #2438 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2438 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [tb]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - sjwtroll ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[intrigueing]

I like meta in theory, but so much meta that I see is the unbearably pretentious and complex kind where the meta writer pulls out load of analysis that is but one possible interpretation of events, and instead of treating it as one possible interpretation of events, they treat it as explicit Word of God canon gospel and judge everything else in canon, and everyone who voices their opinion of canon, according to the idea that their one possible interpretation of events is unimpeachable.

This happens a lot. Repeatedly. And yes, I have some very specific people from various fandoms in mind.

[(Anonymous)]

Yep, there's a big difference between meta and headcanon. Or there should be.