[ SECRET POST #2438 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2438 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [tb]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - sjwtroll ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I have never understood why fandom's critical analysis is even called 'meta' in the first place. It seems like a misuse of the term. I thought 'meta' usually means something self-referential: 'an X about X'. Maybe I'm wrong, but it just irks me every time I see it.

[(Anonymous)]

Well, you're right, in one sense, the prefix meta- is used to mean about (its own category), where metadata is data about data. However, a meta-theory about something is a theoretical examination of what that something is and how it works.