case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-08 03:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #2441 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2441 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

You're illogical leaps are bizzare and there is no real conflict here

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-09-09 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Being serious now.

First off, considering that first part shows that this person clearly has no idea how the male body works, despite being a guy. I wouldn't worry too much about this guys rants as far as your worldview.

He makes an obvious point (and it's been said above me to) that yeah, a guy who's got an erection AND is actively putting it in something has responsibility if they are doing that to somebody who doesn't want it, sure!

Lets use another metaphor, one famous since the Nuemburg trials. A solider ordered to kill by a superior. That soldier may well be afraid of what might happen if they disobey the order, even if it's sketchy. After the war they might even have PTSD from it. However, in many circumstances, that does not magically absolve them of their responsibility if they committed a war crime. They did something bad, even if they feared something bad happening to them.

None of that involves erections, but it still applies I think, to cases like that. Even if there was a real pressure, a real threat those soldiers feared, that doesn't magically change that they raped somebody and wave any consequences they deserve for that. Even if they are sorry now.

Re: You're illogical leaps are bizzare and there is no real conflict here

(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
+1