[ SECRET POST #2441 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2441 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.

[(Anonymous)]

I've heard this argument before, and I'm sorry, I just don't buy it.

If someone hates oppression, or oppressive male behavior, or the flaws in the system that enable these things, then I have no problem with them saying so. I agree! But generalizing it to "men" (or insert any other powerful or privileged group of your choice) conveys to me, whether this is the intention or not, that, if the situation were reversed, the oppressed party would behave exactly the same as their oppressors. The only difference being that they don't currently possess the clout to make their own prejudice policy. Which pretty much yanks the moral high ground right out from under them, as far as I'm concerned.

So yeah, I'm sticking with my original premise. Generalized hatred of other groups of people is bad, full stop. Hatred of bad behavior, bad systems, bad attitudes, bad policies, bad social norms--all of those are a different matter entirely.