Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-09 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2442 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?
Here's a hint. The larger world barely understands queer, and it certainly doesn't understand pansexuality. The reality of the world is anti-bisexual prejudice and discrimination.
Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 01:46 am (UTC)(link)Discrimination is real, but things have, in general, become much better for people like us from the "lying diseased fudgepacker" days. By leaps and bounds. If you can't see that then I don't think you ever will. Times change.
Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?
Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 01:51 am (UTC)(link)Oops! I mean, I don't identify with the label "pansexual." By "bisexual" I do mean I am open to every type of gender identity, as you define it. However that is not how I see "bisexual" used any more outside of academic or retro-political circles, and most people mistake me for only liking cismen and ciswomen.