case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-09 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2442 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: homeboy up yonder

(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
i don't think you understand what's going on here. i'm not arguing with you, i didn't mention etymology, and i'm not arguing etymology with you because i don't care. what i am doing is telling you that 'genderqueer' is not binary. at all. there is no room for argument or debate here. it's a word that was invented specifically for people who weren't in the binary. none of the... i don't even know what to call whatever-the-fuck you're doing now, but whatever it is, it's not going to change the fact that gq isn't a binary term.

fin.

Re: homeboy up yonder

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2013-09-10 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
If genderqueer is not binary. Then bisexual is not binary. Funny how the queer community works that way.

Re: whatamaroon

(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
wow you have to be one of, if not the, dumbest fucking person i have ever had the displeasure of talking about gq-ness to.

Image
aubry: (Buala Bos)

Re: homeboy up yonder

[personal profile] aubry 2013-09-10 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really enjoying this thread because I think you are being impressively calm with a lot of people who are just not understanding what you're saying. Not even on a conceptual level; just on the level of parsing.

My hat, doffed.