[ SECRET POST #2442 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[thene]

But you seem to be making a similar argument in reverse - that bisexual people should 'reconsider our identifier', are 'adhering stubbornly' to our identity, which implies that you think we should regard embracing pansexuality as an appropriate replacement for our identities?

[saku]

a lot of bisexual people are not inclusive as you are, which is why pansexuality isn't going to go away.

i'm not saying bisexual people are adhering stubbornly to their identifier, it's the adherence to the binary system that i'm talking about. and not all bisexual people do this. it is not bisexuality that i take issue with.

[thene]

I neither want nor expect pansexuality to go away! I would just like people who identify with it to stop saying biphobic things, and perhaps to do some shouting down when they see other people saying biphobic things. Because it seems to happen a lot.

[saku]

well i apologise for coming across as biphobic. i'm not; by your definition i would be bisexual myself and i am comfortable with that label if it follows your definition. unfortunately it doesn't in a lot of cases, which is what i'm disdainful of. it is more so the definition that i am against (the definition that adheres to the gender binary, rather) than the term itself.