[ SECRET POST #2442 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed on splitting hairs (DA, btw). Especially since bi could, in the strictest sense, mean any number of things. I mean, if I were only attracted to, say, cis women and third gender folks, but not cis males or FTM individuals, then, yeah, in the most pedantic sense I would be bi.

So would a person who was only attracted to trans folks, but both FTM and MTF.

Forcing bi folks to admit their label is wrong and offensive is just as pedantic and pretty damn terrible. And bigoted as hell.