case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-09 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2442 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
aubry: (Gill)

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[personal profile] aubry 2013-09-10 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not following this line of reasoning.

The general population has misconceptions about just about everything with which they don't have personal experience. Sexualities, religions, political affiliations, careers, sports, hobbies, you name it.

In what other context is the onus on the misunderstood group to change their descriptor so that the lowest common denominator can't mistake their meaning (even though they still will anyway - it's not like people don't already go "pansexual? so you're into everything? Even elves, radiators, Planck's constant and the smell of grass after the rain?" )