[ SECRET POST #2444 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2444 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Still a canon, at least. I mean, canon for BBC Sherlock is not canon for ACD Holmes, and vice versa. They're reinterpretations/AUs, not continuations.

Is there a word for the big canons that have multiple adaptations/variations? Meta-canons? Something like that?

[kelincihutan]

ACD Holmes is not a reinterpretation or an AU. It's the source of all other Holmes adaptations ever. It is the original. It's fair to say that ACD Holmes is, at least a little, more authoritative or authentic considering ACD did invent the character.

That being said, just because it's the inspiration for all the others doesn't mean that those others are wrong/bad/[insert other negative thing here] just because they aren't the original. And BBC!Sherlock is awesome in a million ways, so I don't know what OP's talking about...

[(Anonymous)]

This, thank you. Except the part about BBC Sherlock, whom I can't stand.