case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-13 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2446 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2446 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________

















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]




















04. [WARNING for gore, blood, etc]

[How To Train Your Dragon]


__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for child abuse]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for torture]

[Fall Out Boy's "The Phoenix"]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for underage]

[pokemon conquest]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
helenadax: (ouat)

Re: Not OP

[personal profile] helenadax 2013-09-13 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
But was Henry's adoption legal? Regina had to create a "muggle" identity. And Rumpel was part of it. I have my doubts.
deaalmon: Luna (Default)

Re: Not OP

[personal profile] deaalmon 2013-09-13 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to mention isn't there hazy legality when the father doesn't sign off on putting a kid up for adoption in the first place?

Re: Not OP

(Anonymous) 2013-09-14 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
If the father's not mentioned on the birth certificate, they don't get a say.

Re: Not OP

(Anonymous) 2013-09-13 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I refer you to the part where I said that Reggie was a red herring and doesn't matter.

The show has outright told us that Emma gave Henry up. Everything after that is irrelevant to Emma and Henry's relationship. How Reggie did the voodoo or baby stealing is a different issue (and boy does Henry and Reggie's relationship have issues). However Henry and Emma's relationship is simple. We have been told (short of a massive retcon) that Emma did completely give Henry up. It is a major point in the first episode which Emma does not dispute, in-universe.

That is where the show gets into trouble with the adoptive family community. The show's premise is based on Emma hanging around to be a true parent which is an offensive meme in its own right. They should have found a better way to handle Emma's intro to Storybrooke.

As far as Reggie is concerned, her having a murky adoption-stance clarified in S2 makes it a bit better on count two of the indictment (adoptive parents not being real) and back pedals a bit from the stance in S1 which shows they did listen a bit. It still doesn't change that Neal/Bae is the closest thing that Henry has to a true parent and the Emma/Henry relationship is massively problematic. And also that technically (and I want to choke on these words myself) that with Neal/Bae being out of the picture that Mister Gold/Begbie is the closest thing he has to family rather than the Charmings.

[The Charmings:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRLYJHUeoFE ]

I blame the Secret Poster (and everyone else that brings these points up every goddamn time) for conflating two separate issues. Although if they've only seen S1 then that is fine, because the conflation was pretty valid in S1 due to stupid writing of the show. S2 is better. maybe S3 will find a way to fix this without invoking a retcon, although I personally feel that if they do then it'll be by retcon.