[ SECRET POST #2448 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2448 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

I agree.

I strongly believe OCs should be warned or at least mentioned if you want to avoid trouble.

Though I do agree with the OP's sentiment that OCs are nothing to flip out and shirek at people over.

Also if a fic is warned as having an OC and someone complains about the OC being there. Yeah they can be ignored.

(funfact I once had someone complain about some foreign (non HP) characters in an HP crossover when I warned THREE TIMES (initials before the title,put in the crossover section and labeled as a crossover) that it was a crossover. Not even joking. He had been someone who flamed me for a fic I wrote seven years ago and when I told him he was a little late he tried to hurt my feelings by commenting on something more recent. It was hilariously stupid. )

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

If a fic isn't warned for having an OC and someone complains, they can still be ignored. In fact, they should be. Let people flip out, it just reveals how immature and entitled they are.

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

I looked up and noticed something interesting. One of the people harping about how OC warnings are sooooo important and it's horrible if you don't (a s igned in user upthread) seems to disregard trigger warnings as bullshit.

So in a nutshell "who cares if you give someone a fucking flashback but heaven help you if you cause someone to waste fifteen precious minutes of their lives reading about an OC".

Some priorties there.

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

That user seems to be a troll though.

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Someone making a complaint about an OC not being tagged is hardly immature and entitled. An essay of insults yes, but leaving a comment asking them to tag their OC's? no way, no more than asking them to tag their main pairs or the triggers (although certainly not comparative to triggers)