[ SECRET POST #2448 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2448 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

So... do you also think it's ok to "misstag" the fandoms to get more readers and oh, I see this all the time on AO3 under the excuse of "multifandom drabble collection" that doesn't include one or more of the tagged fandoms?

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

DA

That's annoying. :(

On a slightly different but somewhat related note, this reminds me of someone I ran into in fandom years ago who was deeply aggrieved that fandom expected her to label her fic for pairings. She argued that labeling for pairings was completely ridiculous and just made people skip over fic that they might otherwise have read and enjoyed. I think it was that she liked to sneak unpopular pairings into her fic once the reader was invested, and knew that she wouldn't get the readers if she labeled for the pairing up front.