Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-15 03:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #2448 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2448 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Especially when they start going "Death of the Author"
RE: Ender's Game. None of that changes the fact that Card went back on his own statements and even revised the original work to correct what he perceived (belatedly) as an incorrect interpretation, when he'd accepted that interpretation - and even supported it - before as his own views changed.
Card's far from the only author to do this, either. Nor is Ender's Game the only book he's done the "no no it really meant this" interpretative retcon with, as the poster above me pointed out. Thus, Death of the Author is not only a valid perspective from which to critique literature, in some cases - such as Card's - one must do so.
Re: Especially when they start going "Death of the Author"