case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-16 06:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2449 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2449 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The Hangover. The whole film was full of "Nope" moments, but at lest they were framed in the context of "Comedy". The point I shook my head and would have waked away (If it hadn't been right at the end) was when the dentist character, having spent the entirety of the film cheating on his wife, and even committing bigamy, returns to his wife and pubic humiliates her at the wedding, in front of all her friends. This is framed as a good positive thing where the evil symbol of authority, the "controlling" woman gets what's coming to her.

Nope. Nice try hangover, for a film built on immature man-child power fantasies, that was one too far.

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
pubic humiliates her at the wedding
I'm impressed. How did they get that past the censors?

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
It wasn't their wedding, they were at a friend's wedding.

And the girlfriend was abusive. If I remember well it was implied she actually hit her boyfriend, so it wasn't her just being controlling.

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
Psst. Anon above was making a joke, because the word was "public" was typoed as "pubic."

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
lol oops.

I didn't notice that, that's hilarious.

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
na


Phil: You know she beats him, right?

Stu: Hey- that was...twice! And I was out of line.

Re: the 'nope' moment

(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Ugh... The lady was abusive.

Being humiliated is the least any domestic abuser deserves.

" immature man-child "

So the physical abuse victim is an "immature manchild"?

Things like this make me want to nope out of this community.