Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-16 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2449 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2449 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
She just can't fathom why anybody'd get this emotional about this sort of thing (please correct me if I' wrong b_b)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 01:24 am (UTC)(link)I think some level of identification with things is fairly common. And I don't think that some level of identification is necessarily harmful or abnormal. Certainly to the level that OP does it, it's harmful, but I don't think that getting at least a little defensive about things you really identify with is all that strange. And the thing that's been kind of difficult or confusing in this conversation is that b_b does not seem to acknowledge the validity of any kind of identification at all.
That said, I don't think b_b is sociopathic, and I think the person saying that is kind of out of line.
no subject
Yes, I know that some people get extremely emotionally invested in their characters, and I could probably even give you the series of events and circumstances that lead to it...but I can't comprehend it myself. For me, the best comparison is the way most people might look at a spree-shooter/killer - we know what happened, and we can often pinpoint how or why (i.e. mental disorders, life conditions, environment, circumstances, etc). But we can't actually fathom it or comprehend it for ourselves, or empathize with them.
(Before anyone tries it, I'm not trying to imply that emotional fans and spree killers are on the same plane in any capacity - that level of emotional disconnect is just the best analogy I could come up with on the spot. I understand fans a hell of a lot more than I understand school shooters; it's just that while they are drastically different in terms of scale, the style of understanding is pretty much the same.)
But then, I've been called a sociopath before. I'd believe it if it weren't for the fact my initial reaction to seeing someone struggling with anything is to start throwing solutions at them until they accept one or tell me to shut up. Oddly enough, many people have told me that my lack of emotionalism has made me easy to talk to and seek advice from - because I already have to put other people's emotions into lists and flowcharts in my head in order to understand them, it's easy for me to lay out other people's emotions and thought-processes in a way that's helpful to them. (If I had a dollar for every time someone told me to become a shrink or counselor of some sort, I could probably afford the school fees to go and become one.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-17 04:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject