[ SECRET POST #2449 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2449 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[luxshine]

Oh, I agree that it's a plausible reading. I disagreed about Bannerman recognizing Dodd in Cujo, outside the confused question that, as far as I remember was at a shadow before he actually saw Cujo (I am having troubles to find the scene in my copy right now).

The thing is, while a plausible reading, it does break a bit the whole subject of 'horrible coincidence' that the rest of the book has, and once Bannerman dies, Dodd is never mentioned again. Yes, there's an implication, and I'm sure that if King had been a little less intoxicated when he wrote the book, we would have had more to that -or a complete denial at some point- but it's a bit too much to put 'Cujo was possessed' as a hard fact when the only hard fact is that Cujo had rabies.

[233c]

Except I didn't say it was a hard fact. I said it was implied.