[ SECRET POST #2452 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Giles Coren and Sue Perkins, The Supersizers Eat… The Eighties]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jeff Davis/Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Django Unchained]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Valiant Hearts: The Great War]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Child of Light]

__________________________________________________



07.
[Jurassic Park]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hate Plus]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Three Investigators]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Charlie Hunnam]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/877538.html?thread=685008866

Looks like an account that's only going to be used for stuff like this. I don't know if you feel that banning is an option, but I certainly wouldn't be sorry to see him/her go (though, knowing these people, it probably wouldn't be discouraging).

[(Anonymous)]

Cosigning on this. It really seems like the only person this person signed up is trolling (they even said that's what made them choose their name - that it was crude and juvenile) and most of their posting has been aggressively bad.

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

And obscure. It has a source. Crude, Juvenile, and Obscure thank you very much.

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously? I mean, I think they're a bit of an idiot but I can just scroll past them. But making comments you don't like leads to suggesting a ban? Spare me.

[(Anonymous)]

Especially because that would make widdle twoll feel important and vindicated.

[(Anonymous)]

Well the rape joke was bit of color, but whatevs.

[(Anonymous)]

A troll account used mainly for trolling is nothing new here, though. And you're the one that instantly responded with personal insults. You didn't have to reply to them at all but instead you called them scum and didn't like their response or how things went from there, so you ran to case to whine. Grow up.

[(Anonymous)]

They didn't respond instantly. Bringreligiontothewigwams has been doing this every day since they registered last Saturday.

And even if it's not new here, that doesn't mean that it's good.

[(Anonymous)]

it's got some serious posts. it takes a very trolly tone most of the time but it sounds like a user who likes to troll to me more than someone who is *only* here to troll. p much the same as chardmonster and noodlewhatevsguy

[case]

I'm going to give it a day or two and see if it gets any worse, unless you can link me something worse it's already done?

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

This is actually the first time I noticed him/her (haven't been online much lately), so I pretty much based my judgement on the empty journal and the fact that other people said they were sick of his/her typical crap. But I'll keep an eye out -- though I bet s/he'll try to act nice for a little while now -- so thanks!

[(Anonymous)]

Hey, if makes you feel any better I think that girls who stutter are the best. By the time they've managed to say no to the surprise sex most guys will be lighting up the cigarette.

Advocating the rape of girls that stutter seems way over the line to me.

[tabaqui]

Since everybody including them has acknowledged they're here *just* to troll, why not just utterly ignore? They'll either go nuts trying to get a rise out of someone and get banned, or they're slink away. Win/win either way.

+1

[vethica]

Ignoring is usually the best option with trolls, ime.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't really see how that's any different than insanenoodly guy or the other regulars who fully admit to trolling for fun. Just make a mental note of the name and scroll by.

[(Anonymous)]

Noodles trolls occasionally but will also talk about shit, this one trolls constantly and seems to be here for no other purpose.

[(Anonymous)]

Noodly sometimes makes good comments and brings up a lot of good points. wigwams or whatever doesn't- but then I barely pay attention to wigwams. Nothing of interest there.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't see the difference either. Noodly, chard, overlongusername dude - they all troll with stupid shit. How's this one any different from them? Galawhatever should just scroll past rather than premeptively "oh ban this person I don't like their trolling!!"

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe I've been desensitized by the rest of the internet, but aside from the rape comment, nothing they've said so far has really seemed as bad to me as everyone else seems to think it is. I've basically just been rolling my eyes and scrolling on.

[dreemyweird]

The rape joke etc. were bad, but, admittedly, I kind of like their posts. In a postmodernist way.

[(Anonymous)]

I just can't believe how many people here are defending a self confessed rapist. FS really has fallen very very faw these days where a dude can say he commit rape against disabled girls and people DEFEND him for it.

[dreemyweird]

Hey, hold your horses, I don't think they confessed to a rape. Or did I miss something?

[(Anonymous)]

I just can't believe that you actually believe that they raped someone.

[(Anonymous)]

They irritate me too, but I find it's more satisfying to not reply, see they've gotten no responses and they keep trying.

Try not to raise to the bait? It's pretty obviously bait

[(Anonymous)]

They're having a sensible conversation in #1 and around the other places. Yes they're a troll, probably about as much of a troll as noodly, chard, ponyiconperson and you. Jumping the gun to demand bans because you jumped straight to provoking them with personal insults? Not cool. It would have all died if you'd scrolled on rather than adding more fuel to the fire.