case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-19 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2452 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Giles Coren and Sue Perkins, The Supersizers Eat… The Eighties]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jeff Davis/Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Django Unchained]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Valiant Hearts: The Great War]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Child of Light]

__________________________________________________



07.
[Jurassic Park]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hate Plus]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Three Investigators]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Charlie Hunnam]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
kelincihutan: (Default)

[personal profile] kelincihutan 2013-09-20 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
A "BNF problem?" Now I'm envisioning a subset of SJWs exclusively devoted to "fandom justice" telling you not to be appropriative of smaller fandoms by using them in crossovers and claiming anyone who complains about tumblr-style tags is just displaying their "AO3 privilege" because "not everyone is able to get an invite!"

You're right that whining that someone's review wasn't exactly the way you wanted it to be is a bit egotistical. But whining that people whine about this is also kind of ridiculous. If the comments themselves aren't that big a deal, then neither is the author's reaction unless they are deliberately hassling the commenters. The way you phrased it is...melodramatic, to say the least.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Fandom Justice. I laughed at that

Though, I can see if hassling for updates might be annoying if they are persistent about it and harass the author. People PMing for updates is a thing.
kelincihutan: (Default)

[personal profile] kelincihutan 2013-09-20 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
It totally is irritating, I agree. People who go "Great you finished this. SEQUEL TIME!" make me really annoyed. Doubly so if I am planning a sequel, because when someone says that, I kind of want to not write the sequel just for that.

But that's a really juvenile reaction (from me), and maybe they're, I dunno, seven, and don't know any better. If I'm going to write a story because I want to, stupid reviewers shouldn't be enough to stop me from doing that. So I stand by my claim that it's kind of egotistical to complain that the reviews you get aren't the ones you wanted. Nobody owes you reviews anymore than you owe them fics.

PMing for updates, though, is kind of weird, and arguably stalkery.

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2013-09-20 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
when it happened to me, the PM thing I mentioned upthread?

That was the point I started getting bothered. When it was reviews I was like "well at least I'm getting them". But then I get someone privately sending me this ANGRY message.