case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-19 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2452 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Giles Coren and Sue Perkins, The Supersizers Eat… The Eighties]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jeff Davis/Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Django Unchained]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Valiant Hearts: The Great War]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Child of Light]

__________________________________________________



07.
[Jurassic Park]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hate Plus]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Three Investigators]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Charlie Hunnam]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tei: Rabbit from the Garden of Earthly Delights (Default)

[personal profile] tei 2013-09-20 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
I'm kind of baffled by the idea that you can be doing your job well and be liked by all your colleagues and somehow still be missing some other criteria for "being the right fit for the company." I mean, what the hell else could possibly constitute being the right fit other than those?

I'm sorry that happened!

(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

I suspect that in this instance, "the right fit" means the right fit for the boss and the boss's cronies and yes-people, who probably couldn't care less if the person is a good fit for their actual colleagues.
comma_chameleon: (Jin is usually invalid.)

[personal profile] comma_chameleon 2013-09-20 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
That was pretty much the impression we got too, sadly. That he was pretty much 'fired for mutiny', in our eyes. Which is so disheartening because it's so stupid to fire someone for pointing out the flaws in your "machine" rather than address the legitimate issues that they're bringing up.
comma_chameleon: (Innocent Ariel)

[personal profile] comma_chameleon 2013-09-20 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, what the hell else could possibly constitute being the right fit other than those?

I know, right? It's why we're all so baffled and shocked by this, because to us it was so out of left field that they'd fired him. I mean, the last guy that got fired it was for a legit reason (he stole narcotics).

Whereas this guy was at work on time, was pleasant, helped out, worked hard. He was never out sick (or like some of my co-workers, out "sick"), or anything like that, so we're all stunned by him being fired.

I'm almost hoping that he chose to quit/it's something else that they can't tell us, rather than think that they chose to fire one of the best new hires we've had just because he didn't fully agree with the way we did things. :/