[ SECRET POST #2454 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2454 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Well, there are actually straight guys who'd say that about het porn wherein the male participant is actually featured prominently. Which is not a lot, if you've noticed. Het porn is made with straight men as consumers in mind, after all.

But I feel like you're going off of vary narrow definitions of sexuality with this, as though people can only be turned on by the "appropriate" body parts. In reality, people get aroused by the weirdest things, and it's very subjective. Some people even find sex itself sexy, so they can get off to any porn regardless of preference. It's not at all weird for some straight women to be turned off by description of female bodies in porn, while others can get along just fine. Different strokes. I'd say it'd be "weirder" to find lesbians who are into gay porn, but they exist too.