Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2013-09-23 06:59 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2013-09-23 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2456 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2456 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
[China, Illinois]
__________________________________________________
03.
[The Mortal Instruments]
__________________________________________________
04.
[Community]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Hunter x Hunter, Senritsu/Melody]
__________________________________________________
06.
[Hetalia]
__________________________________________________
07.
[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]
__________________________________________________
08.
[It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Ghostbusters]
__________________________________________________
10.
[Teen Wolf]
__________________________________________________
11.
[Malik Ishtar from Yugi-oh Duel Monsters]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: Any neopagans here?
I just don't understand "I'm an atheist! But spiritually I _____."
It's just incongruous. Do they not want to be theist that bad? If you're spiritual, you aren't atheist. You can certainly respect spirituality, even think it's neat, while being an atheist (see: most university Religion departments), but I'm not sure how you can be "spiritual" but atheist.
It's like those women who are dead set against ever being defined as a feminist but have beliefs that are wholly in line with classical feminism. They've got the right to identify as whatever they want but it looks funny.
Re: Any neopagans here?
Not even wrong.
> ... but I'm not sure how you can be "spiritual" but atheist.
Simple, atheism != physicalism. And spirituality != supernaturalism.
For example, it's entirely consistent to say that karma exists, and karma also applies to gods. I'm also about halfway through David Abram's work on phenomenological animism. I should probably add the just published Dworkin on my reading list.
Re: Any neopagans here?
Re: Any neopagans here?
Re: Any neopagans here?