[ SECRET POST #2460 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2460 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________


















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























05. [SPOILERS for something but OP did not say what]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Dark Lord of Derkholm]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Catching Fire]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for A Touch of Cloth]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Epic]



__________________________________________________




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























11. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for depression, suicide]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (warning for rape) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Bronies = Peadophiles

[(Anonymous)]

My personal thinking is that it's not bestiality if they are of human intelligence and able to communicate. E.G. would you consider having sex with Beast from X-men bestiality?

Re: Bronies = Peadophiles

[(Anonymous)]

Beast is humanoid so it falls in a gray area for me. The ponies are full on animal, so yeah it's beastiality. Or xeno or something. You would be having sex with a non-human animal body. Not saying it's right or wrong - there's definitely different moral implications with intelligent animals that are able to consent, but I still see it as beastiality.

xeno is more appropriat

[insanenoodlyguy]

see my harkness test below, but bestiality implies unintelligence. The ponies are sentient and could thus presumably give consent to sexual acts. They are however very different from humans, so it falls under Xeno.

If they were not sentient, it'd be xenobestiality (real ponies don't look like that)

Harkness test

[insanenoodlyguy]

Re: Harkness test

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Although it's kinda weird to try to put an age on cartoon characters who often are animated ambiguously (or inconsistently during their careers, take Mickey Mouse for example.) It puts me into kinda a weird standard of noting the way Tijuana Bibles and R. Crumb used that for shock value, and being weirded out by pony porn.

Re: Harkness test

[insanenoodlyguy]

Tijuana Bibles didn't bother to always age the characters up either.

Nsfw:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SULXWciuoM8/TS0Mhi1mbnI/AAAAAAAAAW0/_weCjYMcpQ0/s1600/tb+annie.jpg