[ SECRET POST #2461 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2461 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I admit, I'm kind of wondering what it is you seem to enjoy so passionately about shallowly-characterized, dead, or entirely absent female characters.

[(Anonymous)]

Well, there are several shows that I enjoy a lot that are entirely without female characters. If they're just going to suck, why would I want them there? The in-between stage from "no characters" to "good characters" is worse than just "no characters."

[(Anonymous)]

Shallowly-characterized is in the eye of the beholder and I do not find the characters I love shallowly-characterized at all.
I don't know where you're coming from with the dead part.
I have no problems with the absence of female characters from a story. I have no problems with their presence either, proved they're not just shoehorned in, but I'm still sorry that you can only enjoy a story if it's got vaginas in it.
Are you from /u/? You sound like you're from /u/.