Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-29 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2462 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2462 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Let me join you, my friend.
Seriously? Hm, the fact that none of the characters were made to look like idiots on purpose is helpful. I learnt to enjoy unintentional hilariousness; there is something true and fresh in it, something that makes the most unbelievable cinematographic trash look better than the well-shot high-budget films with bad characterization.
Films such as Sherlock and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes (I... actually like this one) easily go beyond the upper limit of "bad" and enter the "so bad it's good" zone. The Rathbone-Bruce production, on the contrary, is excellent in so many regards that a few significant blunders can ruin it altogether.
Sherlock, though? ...We both know nothing can ruin it.
Also, isn't the red-haired chubby inventor!Watson adorable?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-01 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)The next time I see this movie in the TV-schedule, I will try your approach. It makes sense.
And thank you!