case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-03 07:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2466 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.















Notes:

Late day at work, sorry.

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 010 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - omgiknowthem ], [ 1 - troll ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: I have no opinion on this writer, BUT

(Anonymous) 2013-10-04 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
On the other hand, most of the classics were hugely popular in their day, so anyone who thinks that popular writing is always shit, and that Great Writers are always without recognition in their own time, is an idiot and probably a shitty writer.

Re: I have no opinion on this writer, BUT

(Anonymous) 2013-10-04 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
...And? I never said that they didn't, simply that shitty works have a habit of becoming popular, even if there were classics from that time that also became popular.

Re: I have no opinion on this writer, BUT

(Anonymous) 2013-10-04 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Well, actually, you said that books that are popular in their own time aren't the best books of their time. Which does sort of suggest that books that we consider to be classics now, that were popular in their day, don't really deserve their status as classics.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: I have no opinion on this writer, BUT

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-10-04 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
How the heck do you define "hugely popular?"

How do you define "the classics?"