case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-05 03:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2468 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2468 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-05 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I can never properly find the kind of fic I'm looking for, when I find that to be genuinely easy on ff.net, even if lots of it is shit.

This. And its doubly annoying on AO3, because it *Looks* like it should be awesome, and then when it's not, everything just feels super shitty. I mean, I mean, I guess if I want a specific story (eg [trigger warning] suicical characters) it's nice to sort for that tag and then narrow by fandom, but the larger your search parameters get, the more confused the site seems to get.

Csae in point, I was checking the profile of someone who left me kudos recently. There fandoms list was a bunch of stuff I didn't care about and a handful of things I did, so I clicked the link to go to the complete list of their works and tried to filter it down to just the three fandoms I cared about, and it told me there were none. Went back to the main thing, and found two of the fandoms on the first page and the other on the second. So, I think the filter was trying to find one fic that had all three fandoms, and it's just like "that's not at all what I mean."

(Anonymous) 2013-10-05 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
thier is an and/or switch.

the defult is and.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
So, I think the filter was trying to find one fic that had all three fandoms, and it's just like "that's not at all what I mean."

Um, ff.net filters work the same way, dude. If you use the ff.net filters "Sirius B.," "Remus L.," and "English," your search isn't going to return 1) every fic that contains Sirius + 2) every fic that contains Remus + 3) every single Harry Potter fic written in English; it's going to (quite sensibly and usefully) return stories in English that contain both Sirius and Remus. So I'm really not sure why you're complaining about this.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah? And it's CLEAR on FFN that that's what happens. It's NOT/wasn't clear on AO3.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
SA

BTW, not a dude. I know some people are all "Dude is unisex now!" but it's really not.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, way to quibble about something pointless, lady!anon.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, heaven forbid someone should object to male being the default.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yes it is, and has been for decades.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it's picked up double-use as an exclamation. As an epithet for a person, it is still a male term.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Not if you're on the left coast of the US. It's a generic epithet for "person" out here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

It's cool by me that you're making your stand, anon, but I've gotta say that I'm not going to change my terminology in the future. I'm a woman who addresses her female (and male) friends as "dude" and feels generally positive about them doing the same to her. If I knew who you were, I'd avoid calling you something you disliked, obvs. But, as it is, I'm not about to self-censor myself on the off-chance that the next anon I respond to happens to be you again. Sorry.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-07 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
You don't see many civil and sensible responses to people who are being either a) oversensitive or b) trolls, so kudos to you, dude :)